Issue |
EAS Publications Series
Volume 20, 2006
Mass Profiles and Shapes of Cosmological Structures
|
|
---|---|---|
Page(s) | 139 - 148 | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/eas:2006061 | |
Published online | 19 May 2006 |
G.A. Mamon, F. Combes, C. Deffayet and B. Fort (eds)
EAS Publications Series, 20 (2006) 139-148
Kinematical and Dynamical Modeling of Elliptical Galaxies
1
IAP, 98 bis Bd. Arago, 75014 Paris, France
2
Copernicus Astronomical Center,
Bartycka 18, 00-716 Warsaw, Poland
3
Racah Institute of Physics, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
4
Harvard-Smithsonian CfA, 60 Garden Street,
Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
Elements of kinematical and dynamical modeling of elliptical galaxies are presented. In projection, NFW models resemble Sérsic models, but with a very narrow range of shapes (m = 3±1). The total density profile of ellipticals cannot be NFW-like because the predicted local M/L and aperture velocity dispersion within an effective radius (Re) are much lower than observed. Stars must then dominate ellipticals out to a few Re. Fitting an NFW model to the total density profile of Sérsic+NFW (stars+dark matter [DM]) ellipticals results in very high concentration parameters, as found by X-ray observers. Kinematical modeling of ellipticals assuming an isotropic NFW DM model underestimates M/L at the virial radius by a factor of 1.6 to 2.4, because dissipationless ΛCDM halos have slightly different density profiles and slightly radial velocity anisotropy. In N-body+gas simulations of ellipticals as merger remnants of spirals embedded in DM halos, the slope of the DM density profile is steeper when the initial spiral galaxies are gas-rich. The Hansen & Moore (2006) relation between anisotropy and the slope of the density profile breaks down for gas and DM, but the stars follow an analogous relation with slightly less radial anisotropies for a given density slope. Using kurtosis (h4) to infer anisotropy in ellipticals is dangerous, as h4 is also sensitive to small levels of rotation. The stationary Jeans equation provides accurate masses out to 8Re. The discrepancy between the modeling of Romanowsky et al. (2003), indicating a dearth of DM in ellipticals, and the simulations analyzed by Dekel et al. (2005), which match the spectroscopic observations of ellipticals, is partly due to radial anisotropy and to observing oblate ellipticals face-on. However, one of the 15 solutions to the orbit modeling of Romanowsky et al. is found to have an amount and concentration of DM consistent with ΛCDM predictions.
© EAS, EDP Sciences, 2006